Product

Tuesday, 23 September 2025

AI:I blame AI

 You call the airline to change your delayed flight. The agent says he can’t help—the computer won’t let him. You ask to speak to his manager. She says the same thing. You escalate to her manager. Same response. Everyone wants to help you. No one can. The system has decided, & the system doesn’t explain itself.

This is what Dan Davies calls an accountability sink in The Unaccountability Machine.

Accountability sinks are systems designed so that when things go wrong, no individual human can be held responsible for fixing them. He argues that “decisions are delegated to a complex rule book or set of standard procedures, making it impossible to identify the source of mistakes when they happen.”

This often happens the larger the organization becomes. It’s a tactic to diffuse risk.

With AI, this dynamic is likely to worsen. Quoting from the book, “In the future, ‘I blame the system’ is something we will have to get used to saying, and meaning it literally.”

I blame the AI.

When uttered, those words bring the world to a standstill like a Waymo stopped in the middle of a busy intersection. What’s the next step?

It’s fortuitous then that the Founder Mode ethos has arisen at the same time as blaming the AI system. The essence of founder mode is the opposite of accountability sinks. All the responsibility falls to one person.

““The extent to which you are able to change a decision is precisely the extent to which you can be accountable for it.” So designing accountable organizations mean defining roles & systems for people where they are accountable & can override the system’s output.

In addition, Davies argues for feedback loops from the bottom to the top. Skip-level meetings where a manager’s manager meets with a team member is one example.

But in the age of AI, that’s not enough. The digital reams of information racing through an organization may be too much to keep up with. If accountability sinks were a problem before this deluge, imagine the impact afterwards.

Redesigning roles and AI systems with human overrides will be essential to ensuring accountability. At least for now, every key decision still needs a person behind it & maybe that’s enough to rebook quickly enough to get home for dinner.     

No comments:

Post a Comment

Connect broadband

AI:List AI views on when for a naive kin after prolonged life suppression coercive behaviour by family members after demise of father with trauma for kin ocd formed after forced to do rituals, family tribal values honor specific activities, utmost religious activities occult witchcraft enforced to do by elder sibling his wife and mother thrice with great celibacy turned the kundalini activated after deep celibacy penance shouting physical Mental financial Extortion by sibling with toxic behaviours and the wife mother and then mockery suppression asking about who’re your worth backbiting among relatives sector toon negligence of intelligence intuitive behaviour- all religious psychological traps when not work and lead to loss of consciousness of kin trance state recovered by governance with technocrats using AI - kin was asked by mother that he’s to go the male should not be seen in house he’s many absurd thought forcefully in brain mind and outsiders already feel awkward of this kin unresponsive behaviour due to TBI PTSD ocd cvt and tell at workplace social gathering he’s to go and asked for sector toon extortion and mockery in various sense due to un practical behaviour negligence of body building due to neglect ion if essential food nutrition and stubbed suppressed in every sense in religious psychological traps by family members AI humanoid using various neural networks and LLMs for kin and required steps.

  List AI views on when for a naive kin after prolonged life suppression coercive behaviour by family members after demise of father with tr...